March 16, 2010
Whistler RCL-100 and RLC-250 Software Updates are Available
Just a quick post, if you have a Whistler-100 or RLC-250 new software updates are now available.
March 12, 2010
They Shorten the Yellow Lights!
The cities that install red light cameras would not shorten the yellow lights would they? Even in towns that are not purposely trying to rip-off their citizens, the people installing the camera systems are. According to this article, Redflex in the city of League City, Texas has been busted doing just that!
"The camera company installed cameras here like they have done elsewhere where they knew they could take advantage of the poor engineering and short yellow change intervals," Schirmbeck told TheNewspaper. "Instead of fixing the problem and seeing what effect that has they choose to profit from a dangerous situation."
The practice of shortening yellow light intervals is very common because it is also very profitable. From the story:
"A study by the Texas Transportation Institute found that violations jumped 110 percent when yellow light timing was reduced by one second under the bare minimum amount (view study). Conversely, the addition of one second beyond the bare minimum yielded a 40 percent collision reduction."
So there you go. The cities and companies that put in red light cameras do not care about your safety. In fact they are making driving more dangerous on purpose so they can make money off of you. This is not a gray area, if you live where politicians have installed cameras they are purposefully endangering your safety to make money.
Protect yourself with a red light camera detector. We have several to choose from and they might just save you from getting a ticket.
February 25, 2010
The Whistler RLC 250
Whistler's new RLC 250 is their new entry into the line of red light and speed camera warning systems. Many RLC systems use a small monochrome display, the RLC-250 instead has a 1.6", easy to read, multi-color display. Like other RLC systems, the RLC-250 compares your current GPS location with an on-board database of red light and speed camera locations and alerts you when you are near one.
It is also a lot smaller than you might think. In the picture is a Whistler XTR 695 SE (I told you we had them in stock!), a Whistler RLC 100, and in the front is the Whistler RLC 250. It is much more compact than most radar detectors. Also, one thing many people overlook is that since you only need to have a clear GPS signal, it can be mounted just about anywhere on the dash. Yes, that means even on top of the driver's side console. Just make sure it has an unobstructed path for a clear GPS signal.
One thing we do not like, it seems to be lacking the ability to plug a radar detector into it like you are able to do with the RLC 100. We really would have liked to have had that ability. I am sure many of you are like we are and have way too many gadgets already plugged in as it is. Well at least we have some cigarette lighter adapter / splitters available.
If you have been looking for a compact RLC with a nice display, then give the RLC 250 a look. We have them here for $114.95. They are much cheaper than a ticket for not coming to a complete stop before turning right on a red light. Crooked politicians.
February 17, 2010
Escort SC55 Safety Camera Locator
Ok, that is not the best name for the device, but it is what Escort is calling it for now. SC55 Red Light Camera Detector / System is a bit more in-line with standard industry nomenclature. Escort SC55 will do though.
The Escort SC55 is a new addition to devices that are able to warn you about red light and speed cameras. You know, those little cameras at stop lights that are installed by crooked politicians. Even though the cameras are being removed by any city with a sense of moral responsibility, they are still around and in use in many places.
There are already several devices available that use GPS coordinates combined with a list of camera locations to warn you when you are near one. That way you can be aware that any yellow light will last about .00001 seconds and you might also be involved in a crash. The first step to avoiding a trap is knowing it is there.
The Escort SC55 is here to help. Like other camera warning systems, it uses GPS location and a database. The SC55 is promising pinpoint GPS placement (not much good being warned after you go through an intersection) and an updatable, and accurate database. In fact the Escort's Defender™
Database is rather highly regarded (and is the one currently used by Escort 9500ix and BELTRONICS Pro GX65 integrated RLC / radar detectors).
We are looking forward to seeing how well the SC55 will do compared to other RLC devices currently available from Cheetah and Whistler.
The SC55 will have an optional kit to connect to certain Escort and Beltronic radar detectors. If the SC55 will work with the Redline radar detector, it could make for a very versatile protective system. The SC55 should start at around $159.95 for the base model and $179.95 with the connector kit. The SC55 will be a great way to have GPS red light warning functionality for a good price. When you realize that the cost of a red light ticket is often that much (or more), the extra preventative warning is worth it.
As soon as we have them here in our warehouse we will let all of you know. Unlike some websites, we stock every radar detector, red light camera system, laser jammer, and accessory we sell. They should be here in a few weeks.
SC 55 Safety Camera Locator sounds like a diagnostic tool for use with security cameras though.
January 21, 2010
Red Light Cameras are About Money not Safety
Red light cameras continue to pop-up in new cities and towns, but they also are coming back down in others. Not every city government is willing to fine its own citizens unfairly and treat them as a revenue resource. In Dalton Georgia the cameras are being removed even though they were making a lot of money from the cameras. According to this article:
At $75 a pop, 6,906 citations were issued that year, mostly for illegal right-on-red turns; 624 citations were issued in February alone.
In 2008 though the Georgia state legislature started to look at the claims that red light cameras were just to make money. They ordered yellow lights to be lengthened and the number of tickets being issued to people "running" red lights decreased substantially. We have already mentioned in this blog how many cities reduce the yellow lights to purposefully trap people so they can ticket them even if it causes more wrecks to take place. In most cities, failing to come to a dead, complete stop before turning right on red will get you a $200 ticket. It has nothing to do with catching people that run a red light on purpose.
The mayor of Dalton, David Pennington was paying attention to all of this.
"That sort of exposed the myth of why they're there," says Mayor David Pennington, an opponent of red-light cameras. "It goes against what I was told to begin with, which is that they are for safety."
So he had the red light cameras removed. He placed the financial welfare of the people in the community over making money off of them. The people of Dalton should be proud to have him as their mayor.
If you live in a city or town with red light cameras, they are just there to make money off of you. They do not promote safety, for that they just need to increase the length of yellow lights. Find out who in your local government is responsible for having them installed, and question why they want to treat their very own citizens as cash generators. Drive them from office, they just want to use you. They are so inept, they cannot be fiscally responsible enough to run a city without stealing money from their own citizens.
We carry red light camera detectors and other automotive defensive products so you can protect yourself from expensive tickets. Be an informed, and most importantly a safe driver.
December 17, 2009
Redlight and Speed Camera Warning Systems Reviewed
Regular readers and customers know that here at Buy Radar Detectors, we like to help you find the radar detector, camera warning system, laser jammer, etc... that is best for your personal driving needs. We work with you to research all of the products available, and we even offer services to help. We also really like independent reviewers. They often offer a perspective and analysis that helps all of us stay better informed of the many devices available. In turn we are able to provide real world opinions on different devices, and help find what is best for you.
One of the independent review sites we like here at our radar detector lab is radartest.com. There are two new articles over there that many of you will find interesting. The first article is on redlight camera databases. It provides some interesting information on how the camera databases work, as well as a comparison of some of the most common ones in use.
In the second article, there is a product comparison test between some of the leading combination radar detector / camera warning systems. If you have been thinking about buying a GPS enabled radar detector you will want to give it a look.
I think all of this warrants a new contest! Send an email to us at contest @ buyradardetectors.com (remove the blank spaces) briefly telling us about the time you wished you had a camera warning system, were saved by one, or a review of one of the systems. Your entry might even end up here on our radar detector blog, and the five best are going to win a free t-shirt (make sure to include what size shirt and a shipping address in your email).
So go and read the articles about redlight camera systems, and let us know if you have any questions!
November 24, 2009
Redlight Camera Warning System Gift Ideas
Do you know of someone that spends a lot of time driving where there are redlight cameras? Well, we may have a few gifts they might like.
The Cheetah C100 Redlight / Speed Camera Detector ($224.95)is pre-loaded with thousands of safety camera GPS locations, including redlight and fixed positions speed cameras, and you can even mark up to 100 locations yourself. The C100 also has the Rescue Me feature, which when enabled, will announce your exact GPS co-ordinates. A digital compass is also included and with a press of a button, the C100 will announce your driving direction.
The Whistler RLC-100 Redlight / Speed Camera Detector ($79.99) also uses GPS locations with an on-board database of redlight and speed camera locations, and alerts you when you are near one. Another great feature of the RLC-100 is that it has a secondary power outlet so you can connect a radar detector or other 12 volt device to it. (Interface cable sold separately - Radar detectors that use a phone style jack will also need to use our Bel / Escort Barrel Power Cord Adapter).
These are a true GPS warning systems. They do not require you to use redlight camera websites for inconsistent updates, or have to constantly check your location on a phone or navigational display while driving.
September 25, 2009
What Those Redlight Cameras Really Catch People Doing
"Oh, don't lean on me man 'cause you can't afford the ticket" - David Bowie
Most people do not run redlights on purpose. While this may seem like a strange fact to some, I have never encountered anyone that runs lights for fun. "I was so late for work, I just ran all the lights!" Most of these redlight cameras are being put in to give tickets to people that do not come to a complete stop when turning right on red. Most people come to a rolling stop, then turn. In fact if you do come to a stop, the person behind you will start laying on the horn.
Meanwhile, you get processed a ticket that tends to run $100. Have a nice day, drive safe!
Here is an interesting news story about just this. In Collier Florida the citizens are getting more than a bit annoyed at getting tickets.
Collier County Commissioner Jim Colletta tells WINK News that during the month of August at the intersection of Vanderbuilt Beach Road and U.S. 41, the cameras caught 507 red light violations, but 500 of those happened when drivers didn't stop before making a right on red.
Out of 507, only 7 were people that ran a light. The rest just did not come to a complete stop when making a right turn. Many cities now know that all you have to do to make some money is shorten the yellow lights, and to also ticket those turning right on red. It is pure revenue.
"I don't have any violations or citations on my driving record, so for me to even get that letter was shocking," Marjorie Burnham says.
It is not about safety, at all. It is about publically elected and appointed officials making money from their constituents. They want us out there playing bumper cars with each other, and causing road rage, while they profit.
...Burnham says she isn't taking any chances.
"I sit there and cars honk at me to move along (at a right turn), but I'm not going to because I can't afford another ticket!"
August 27, 2009
Take a Redlight Camera to Court
In previous post I have discussed redlight cameras and how they are only about making money. In some areas, citizens are taking their elected government officials to court to have the cameras removed. They have realized that redlight cameras are just a money making scheme. They have nothing to do about safety. A camera is never going to make driving safer, only active police involvement will. In Brandenton Florida, the city is being sued over the fact that, according to this article:
Critics of the cameras say numerous cities in Florida, including Bradenton, are circumventing state law by putting up the cameras to make money under the guise of public safety.
Now in a counter argument, the police chief Michael Radilowski sates that:
"It is going to make a lot of money because red-light running is an epidemic here," Radzilowski said. "The bottom line is, don't run a red light if you don't want to pay a fine."
So according to the police chief, people running redlights has become an "epidemic". To fix this vehicular epidemic that has turned the intersections of Brandenton into a demolition derby, they going to just install some cameras and issue tickets. So much for public safety. Why don't they, oh, have actual police go out to these know spots of daredevil driving.
According to Bradenton Council member Marianne Barnebey:
"We wouldn't have to do this if people were obeying the laws here," she said. "But innocent people are losing their lives."
Are the people in Brandeton that bad at driving? Do they think that some camera will stop this with just a few tickets if she is telling the truth? Or are the people in charge of the safety and well being of the citizens of Brandeton a lot more interested in making money and using a lot of extreme reasoning to scare others into not challenging them.
If you live in an area with these cameras, then fight to have them removed. If the city you live in is thinking about installing them, make sure the people who propose this never get elected to anything ever again. Until then we will continue to provide redlight camera warning systems and other countermeasures to help protect you. Keep safe!
August 13, 2009
Redlight Cameras and Bumper Cars
It seems that over in Des Plains Illinois, the citizens are tired of redlight cameras turning their intersections into bumper car rides. They just do not like crashing into other people like everyone in Washington DC. From the news story:
"The problem is that people slam on their brakes when they know the intersection has a camera and the light turns yellow," said Brookman. "They won't dare go through a yellow and this causes rear-end crashes. Studies have shown that Red Light cameras lead to more crashes." He also said that drivers often approach intersections when the light is green and expect to travel through safely. However, if the light suddenly turns yellow and they're only a few feet from the intersection, they may not have time to stop unless their slam on the brakes creating a dangerous situation.
So add another city to the list that wants these things gone. Redlight cameras are put in to make money, not improve driving safety. So if your town or city is looking to have them put in, ask where the money is going, because it is not about making your drive better.
There are a lot of movies out there where someone is able to change the traffic lights which in turn causes a lot of wrecks. I wonder if the cities that install these cameras have people sitting around watching people crash into each other all day. That is worth paying them at least $100 a ticket, right?
If you want to warned about where these cameras are, we have some very affordable redlight detectors and countermeasures. They are cheaper than a ticket, may save you from paying higher insurance rates, and also avoid having to get your vehicle repaired from playing bumper cars. Be careful out there.
July 24, 2009
Not a Whistler Radar Detector, a Whistler RLC-100 Redlight Detector
That is correct, this post is not about a Whistler radar detector. It is not even about a radar detector by Escort or Bel. I would like to introduce you to Whistler's foray into the world of redlight camera warning systems, the Whistler RLC-100.
The Whistler RLC-100 is a complete warning system, it compares your current GPS location with an on-board database of red light and speed camera locations and alerts you when you are near one. The database is updateable and the RLC comes with a free one year subscription. It is also very compact and takes up very little room.
One of the things we like most about it, it has a secondary power outlet so you can connect a radar detector or other 12 volt device to it (Interface cable sold separately - Radar detectors that use a phone style jack will also need to use our Bel / Escort Barrel Power Cord Adapter). This means fewer power cords dangling everywhere using up your car's power outlets.
This is a very affordable GPS enabled warning system. You will not be relying on a redlight camera "service" or website for inconsistent updates, or have to constantly check your location on a phone or navigation display while driving.
With more and more cities installing redlight and speed cameras, a good warning device is almost a necessity to avoid overpriced fines. Failing to come to a complete stop before turning right in some places is now a $100 ticket. Not to mention all of the yellow lights that now last only a few seconds to catch as many people as possible driving under them.
We have the Whistler RLC-100 ready to ship for $79.99!
July 23, 2009
Why Are Cities with Redlight Cameras Fining You?
A question, if the use of redlight cameras is to reduce the number of wrecks, improve safety, catch those that do not use cowardly devices, then why do they issues fines? If this is about safety, should they not make you attend a driving safety class, make you wear a funny hat, or just call and yell at you. "Drive safer, we saw you run that light, maniac!"
Ok, I know fines are a great motivator. However the people in River Forest, Il want to know "...whether the village's desire to have red light cameras was a safety or money issue." The people in River Forest wanted to lower the fines, and some interesting information slipped out.
It seems that the people who install the redlight cameras make about $36 per ticket issued, then police have to have people review and issue tickets. So for the process to be cost effective it runs up to $100 a fine.
Village President John Rigas said he'd spoken with River Forest Police Chief Frank Limon, who said there was only one type of red light violation. Whether people failed to stop on a right turn or simply ran the light, there was a violation of the law, Rigas said.
That can be a lot of money for just not coming to a complete stop to turn right on a redlight. The truth is they are using them to make money, not improve driving safety. The people selling the cameras are making even more money. So if you live in a city with cameras, make sure to tell them thanks for making the camera operators rich.
I doubt any of us want people to run redlights, but making the lights shorter to "catch" people, and putting people making a turn on red in the same category out of greed is irresponsible. Make sure you are warned about the intersections with cameras, and please contact us if you have any questions about redlight camera protective devices, or if you are looking for a radar detector.
July 20, 2009
If You Use A Redlight Camera Warning Device You Are a Dirty Coward!
Well this story has been making its way around. Many of you probably have already read it, but for the rest of you, here is a quick summary. Essentially the police chief of Washington DC, Cathy Lanier, is saying that those who have GPS redlight warning systems such as this one are using a "cowardly tactic".
She is actually upset that people are being warned about dangerous intersections. Because that is why the police have cameras there right, to make them safer. They are not shortening the lights in order to make money are they? Are the body repair shops around DC owned by the police? Just wondering. So prove your courage to Catchy Lanier, get in some more crashes! Turn all of DC into a giant demolition derby! Wimps! So what about insurance, or repair bills, lets smash some cars!
Those that read our blog know the truth about these cameras, and our stance on them.
Ok, for the rest of the month, if you live in the DC metro area, we are giving 10% off of every product that warns of redlight cameras, and related defensive products. We will need you to call us, and the billing and ship to address needs to be in the DC area. So give us a call, and until then be careful out there.
So show your cowardice! Buy a redlight camera protective device.
July 2, 2009
Red Light Cameras in the News, Again...
Readers of this blog know that I do not like red light cameras. If anything they cause wrecks since the people that install them also shorten the yellow lights. They often tell the city "shorter yellow lights means more tickets and more money!" They leave off the "...and cause more car wrecks" part. Notice I did not call these automotive accidents, nothing accidental about planned crashes.
Well over in Schaumburg, Illinois they are getting rid of red light cameras. According to a story on ars technica, Schaumburg, a suburb of Chicago, had some cameras put in to help prevent accidents. They thought they were doing a good thing, and help to make some dangerous intersections safer. The cameras did nothing, well they did make a lot of money from people making right hand turns that did not come to a complete stop.
So, people complained, the city realized that cameras were not reducing wrecks, so Schaumburg is getting rid of the cameras.
Yup, the city noticed that the cameras do nothing to improve safety. If a city wants to improve intersections, perhaps they should invest in better traffic lights and they way the intersection is designed and heavy traffic is managed. Fix the roads first! So if you have red light cameras where you live, ask them if they are all about money and why they do not care about your safety.
Until then, we will continue to provide defensive products to protect you from the cameras. Drive safe, and drive smart!
March 26, 2009
No More Red Light Cameras in One State
We have been talking a lot about red light cameras lately it seems. Well here is a short bit of information on the fight to remove red light cameras. Mississippi has passed a law that will remove red light cameras from the state.
Jackson Mississippi has stopped issuing tickets or collecting fines based on pictures taken by red light cameras already. The only remaining city with red light cameras, Columbus has until October 1st to remove them. The law also makes the installation of new red light cameras illegal, stopping their installation in other cities in the state.
This relates to red light cameras only, not to in-car police cameras or even speed cameras. From the article, the law passed "...the House 117-3 on Feb. 11. It passed the Senate 42-9 on March 4." That looks a bit one sided, and it would seem that people are being listened to at least in one state.
As long as sates view red lights as more of a revenue generator, than say a tool for traffic management, we hope to keep you informed. We offer a great selection of camera protection devices until the cameras are gone.
Way to go Mississippi!
March 19, 2009
I Need a New Radar Detector! Wait, No I Need a Red Light and Speed Camera Detector. Oh, You can Have Both!
Ok, after the last Veil Guy post, we started talking about how there are a lot of interesting red light and speed camera related products out now in the world of radar detectors. So we decided to create a list of the most popular products that function as both a radar detector and camera detector.
Even though some communities have been able to have red light and speed cameras removed, their use is still growing. Combine that with the fact that some cities are purposely shortening the length of yellow lights to generate revenue. (I had to retype that last part. Making a light shorter just to write more tickets is rude and annoys me. My first comment was more vehement .)
So here you go, our list of radar detectors that can also be used to warn you of Yellow Light Cash Generators. (See what I did there.) Oh, we would like to point out, this list is far from comprehensive. We also have some detectors with opional red light and speed camera components you can get separately. These however have everything you need in one box:
Bel Professional Series GX65 Radar Detector (Red Display) Preloaded database of camera locations that can be updated from their website or manually updated.
Cobra XRS R9960G Radar Detector Preloaded database of camera locations that can be updated from their website or manually updated.
Escort Passport 9500ix Radar Detector (Blue Display) Preloaded database of camera locations that can be updated from their website or manually updated.
Escort Passport 9500i Radar Detector (Blue Display) Note: You must manually enter the camera location.
Escort Passport 9500i Radar Detector (Red Display) Note: You must manually enter the camera location.
March 17, 2009
The Veil Guy vs. Red Light Cameras (Well Sorta)
It would seem this is a good time of year for comparison test. We just had our License Plate Protection Comparison Test of 2009, and the Veil Guy has a great test of GPS red light/speed camera/radar detectors over at his blog.
As part of his review of the new Cobra XRS 9960G, he also compares the Beltronics Professional Series GX 65, the Escort Passport 9500ix, and the Cheetah C100 GPS camera/radar detectors. So watch the video for a real world product test.
Oh, and for that intersection (towards the end of the video) where the cameras were not detected, well some extra protection might be a good idea.
We hope this helps those in areas implementing red light/speed cameras, and answers some of your questions. As always, contact us with any questions concerning these products.
March 9, 2009
The Great License Plate Protection Comparison Test of 2009
Here at Buy Radar Detectors we found ourselves looking at the different anti-photo plate protection products we carry, and we thought a small, informal comparison test might be needed. Well, not needed. More like we thought it would be fun to get outside on a nice spring day. So after obtaining a test vehicle we decided to see how well each product would work, and how noticeable they were.
Plan A we had to cancel. It mostly involved duct tape, the four lane freeway outside, a cheap camera equipped cell phone, and a tall tree. Wishing to avoid upsetting area commuters and for a more controlled test environment, we instead decided on a more scientific approach to our comparison test. Hereafter known as Plan B.
In our test we will be reviewing the following products:
TollFree Protector Anti-Photo License Plate Cover
Super Protector Anti-Photo License Plate Cover
Photo Blur Anti-Photo License Plate Cover
Photo Stopper Anti-Flash License Plate Spray
For testing the plate covers we used a Canon EOS Rebel XTi tripod mounted camera with a Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM SLR lens and a Canon 430EX flash. We took three pictures of each product:
- Picture from above (camera height 7'10") - This position should provide an idea of how the plate cover would perform against a red light camera, which are typically mounted high in an intersection and angled down.
- Picture from behind (camera height 4'3") - This position should give you an indication of how the license plate cover will appear to other drivers or police officers that are looking at your vehicle from behind.
- Picture from the side (camera height 4'3") - This position should provide an idea of how the plate cover would perform against photo radar equipment, where the camera is typically positioned on the side of the road.
We also used the flash in every plate cover picture, as this is typical for photo enforcement equipment. For the Photo Stopper anti-flash spray, we used the same equipment (camera height 4'3") and show each angle, with and without a flash, to show the effect of the product.
For an anti-photo product to be effective it needs to achieve a delicate balance. At angles used by photo enforcement equipment, the license plate numbers should appear obscured. On the other hand, when viewed straight-on the numbers need to appear clear and legible to avoid attracting any unwanted attention.
Please Note: Actual conditions vary according to camera location, time of day, and weather conditions. This is an informal test, and subjective. Feel free to try this at home.
For Plan B we did try to have some controls in place with similar lighting, same test vehicle, same camera, and same camera location. We also used a ladder from the warehouse for the "above" test to get a better result.
TollFree Protector Anti-Photo License Plate Cover
The Toll Free Protector is advertised as offering the best protection against cameras at the cost of being more noticeable. At first glance, this appears to be the case. The shot from the side completely obscures the plate number, and when viewed straight-on it is fairly obvious there is a plate protector. The shot from the top did not turn out as well as we had hoped. The numbers seem to be obscured, but if you look very closely you can make out at least 5 of them. Is this enough to save you from a ticket?
Super Protector Anti-Photo License Plate Cover
Next, we have the Super Protector, which is typically advertised as being the best mix of effectiveness and noticeability. From above, well... you are getting a ticket. From the rear, it is far less obvious than the TollFree Protector. From the side it does partly obscure half of the numbers (which is what it is supposed to do).
Photo Blur Protector Anti-Photo License Plate Cover
The Photo Blur actually looks a lot like the standard "clear" bubble plate covers sold in most automotive supply stores. It is generally advertised as being the plate cover that is least likely to attract unwanted attention, as even at an angle the obscuring looks more like a glare from the sun or accidental distortion. One very important feature we liked, unlike the other two protectors it does not require a separate tag frame to hold the cover in place. With some states making plate frames a violation, this alone is interesting.
This one surprised us, from above it does partly obscure the tag numbers, enough to possibly keep from getting a ticket. It also does a good job from the side. From a straight-on view it performs as advertised, being the least noticeable of the covers we tested.
Bonus test!
Photo Stopper Anti-Flash License Plate Spray (With and without flash.)
Photo Stopper does a great job at making your plate look shiny! While it does slightly overexpose the picture when a flash is used, it was not enough to obscure the plate number in our setup. Perhaps the results would have been better with a stronger flash or with a license plate where the numbers are not black and raised? We're told that products like this tend to work against older equipment, but are fairly ineffective against newer technology.
With Flash
Without Flash
With Flash
Without Flash
So there you go. The one we thought would block the plate from every angle, the TollFree Protector, is not so great when the picture is taken from above (better from the side though!). And it may lead to interesting conversations with local law enforcement officers. The Super Protector worked from the side. If you want the best mix of possibly obscuring a picture of your plate while not being very obvious, the Photo Blur does a rather good job. Finally, all the PhotoStopper spray really does is make your plate look shiny and new.
In closing, one of the better ways we have seen to avoid the cameras:
